Web tools platform 2.0

By default, they are only generated for Dynamic Web projects. Check your server documentation for details. Adopters may also make use of corresponding new APIs found in the org. More flexible validation The validation framework now supports Content Types, so additional filename added to content types on the Content Type preference page will also be validated by their respective validators.

For adopters, new APIs have been added to the validation framework supporting turning on and off individual validators, translating into increased convenience, utility, and performance. This mergerClass should implement the newly defined org. IMerger interface which contains a load and merge method. This class is used for the purpose of Web services skeleton file merging for the Web service implementation type.

A org. JavaMerger has been defined for the Java Web service implementation type. Web services pop-ups now takes custom types Adopters of the Web services creation framework can now use the same Web services pop-ups provided by the framework to process their custom types. The English strings are provided as the default resource bundles. Other language support, if any, will rely on the community support. CVS or Subversions. Specifically, A WTP 1. A WTP 2. A WTP 1. Attempts to use or convert to new 2.

WTP 2. Eclipse WTP 2. No special attention will give for being compatible with previous Eclipse versions. A partial list of the new WTP components is:. Items listed reflect new features of the Web Tools Platform, or areas where existing features will be significantly reworked.

TBD Each item indicates the components likely affected by that work item many items involve coordinated changes to several components. Numbers in parentheses link to bugzilla problem reports for that plan item. Users should expect API and tool refinements in these areas, with a likelihood for more rapid and extensive revisions than in the base WTP code, along with initial API declarations in the 2.

Focused effort will be made to reduce bug backlog, improving test coverage, performance and performance testing, ISV documentation and examples, usability and UI consistency. We should take a two-phase approach. WTP currently has only a small dependency on RDB, which might be migrated to DTP or, perhaps, will be replaced by a more a generic, loose, optional dependency.